The Mauritius Convention on Transparency — A Model for Further Reforms of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

This article addresses the question of whether the Mauritius Convention on Transparency should be taken as a model for further reforms to modernise investor-state dispute settlement. It argues that there is a need to take into account the relationship between an instrument/mechanism like the Convention and the procedural and substantive issues at stake as well as the relationship between such an instrument and the investment treaties to which it is meant to apply.

Tag: Compliance and Transparency, Dispute Settlement, Investment Policy, Monitoring